NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A Sullivan County judge heard oral arguments Thursday to determine whether New York Attorney General Letitia James should be removed as special prosecutor in the reopened criminal investigation into an alleged gang rape at Cornell University.
The proceeding ended without an immediate ruling from Judge James Farrell.
The hearing stems from a challenge filed by defense attorney Andrew Miltenberg, who represents Gillio Lopes, one of the men accused in the case.
Lopes is one of seven former Chi Phi fraternity brothers who are accused in a lawsuit of drugging and raping a female Cornell student at their fraternity house in October 2024.
LETITIA JAMES FACES NEW PUSH TO BOOT HER FROM CORNELL RAPE PROBE OVER ALLEGED BIAS: COURT DOCUMENTS
Defense counsel argued that social media comments posted by James prior to her official appointment as “special prosecutor” demonstrate a pre-existing bias and a presumption of guilt that undermines the prosecution’s neutrality.
“What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable,” James had posted on social media. “I’m holding her in my heart and in my prayers. To her, and to all survivors: you’re not alone. We stand with you.”
TISH JAMES CONFRONTED ON CAMERA OVER TRUMP’S ACCUSATION OF BIAS IN CORNELL RAPE CASE
Arguing before the court, Miltenberg pointed to those public declarations of support as proof of a pre-determined bias.
“Whether it affects all or just one, either the court determines the statements made by AG James take her out of contention to be neutral party reviewing case or not,” Miltenberg argued, calling the initial public statements an “original sin” for the case.
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
SIGN UP TO GET THE LATEST TRUE CRIME NEWS
In a statement sent to Fox News on Thursday, a spokesperson for James’ office said, “As indicated in our motion before the court, these claims are without merit. The Office of the Attorney General remains committed to conducting an investigation guided only by the facts, the evidence, and the law.”
THE FOX TRUE CRIME HUB
Representing the state, Assistant Attorney General Kaitlin Vigars defended Gov. Kathy Hochul’s appointment of James and pushed back against the disqualification effort, emphasizing that public statements alone do not meet the legal threshold for removal.
CORNELL RAPE ALLEGATIONS PROMPT NY ATTORNEY GENERAL LETITIA JAMES TO OPEN ‘ACTIVE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION’
Vigars argued that to warrant disqualification, there needs to be a showing of actual prejudice rather than speculative claims of bias.
SEND US A TIP
CORNELL SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE REVIVES SCRUTINY OF A LITTLE-KNOWN NEW YORK LAW ON INTOXICATED VICTIMS
Farrell peppered Vigars with questions about the circumstances leading up to James’ appointment, including if Hochul was aware of James’ social media comment, if James and Hochul were standing together when the governor made remarks about the “brave young woman,” if that runs afoul of professional conduct, and if the purpose of appointing the AG was to avoid bias.
Farrell also raised broader procedural concerns during the arguments, noting the potential for conflicting legal rulings if challenges proceed piecemeal across jurisdictions.
LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST
“If multiple judges come down with decisions that’s chaos,” Farrell said from the bench, “and the court should not fashion chaos.”
GET BREAKING NEWS BY EMAIL
Hochul appointed James as special prosecutor on Oct. 1 after stepping in to bypass the local Tompkins County district attorney, who had previously declined to bring charges.
CORNELL RAPE ACCUSER CAN REMAIN ‘JANE DOE’; JUDGE WARNS THREATS COULD LEAD TO FEDERAL CHARGES
With no decision rendered at the conclusion of Thursday’s arguments, the judge is expected to issue a formal written ruling in the coming days on whether James will remain as special prosecutor or if the investigation must be reassigned.
Read the full article here